Raise cigarette tax to save taxpayers money

It’s a rare occasion when Kentucky legislators can save taxpayers money by raising a tax.

Gov. Steve Beshear’s proposal to raise the state cigarette tax by 70 cents a pack is one of those occasions. The proposal is not only good public policy, it’s a financial no-brainer.

It’s also why a year after Beshear first proposed it — only to see House members cut the increase to 25 cents and Senators kill it — it’s worth trying again.

Beshear’s main motivation for trying again is to get much-needed revenue for state government, which faces a $456 million budget shortfall. The governor estimates the cigarette tax increase would bring in $81.5 million this fiscal year and $144 million next year.

But nobody thinks a cigarette tax will solve state government’s money problems. Many people believe Kentucky needs comprehensive tax reform, which would include taxes on services and more taxing authority for local governments.

The big payoff from raising the cigarette tax isn’t the revenue it would bring to state government, but the long-term savings it would bring to Kentucky taxpayers and businesses.

A lot of people seem to understand that. A statewide poll in May by the Herald-Leader and WKYT-TV showed 55 percent of Kentuckians support raising the cigarette tax to $1, while 34 percent oppose it.

Since then, several powerful groups have endorsed a higher cigarette tax, including the Kentucky Chamber of Commerce, the Northern Kentucky Chamber of Commerce and the Kentucky League of Cities.

Kentucky, which in 2005 raised the cigarette tax from 3 cents to 30 cents, still has one of the lowest rates in the region. Among surrounding states, Virginia also has a 30-cent cigarette tax, and Missouri’s is only 17 cents. The tax is 55 cents in West Virginia, 62 cents in Tennessee; 98 cents in Illinois; 99.5 cents in Indiana; and $1.25 in Ohio.

Kentucky lawmakers will get a lot of pressure from border-county retailers, who make big bucks selling cigarettes to bootleggers who resell them in high-tax states. The chambers of commerce are sensitive to putting Kentucky retailers at a disadvantage. That’s why they would prefer a smaller increase than Beshear is seeking.

But those business organizations also recognize that when cigarettes get more expensive, fewer people smoke. And when fewer people smoke, businesses and taxpayers spend a lot less money treating smoking-related illness.

“Health costs are eating us up in Kentucky,” said David Adkisson, president of the Kentucky Chamber of Commerce, who said a survey of the membership showed 80 percent support higher cigarette taxes to discourage smoking. “Employers’ top concern is heathcare costs.”

Smoking rates in Indiana dropped 20 percent when the state raised its cigarette tax from 44 cents to 99.5 cents in July 2007. Other states have seen similar results.

Kentucky leads the nation in most measures of smoking, including smoking by young people and pregnant women, as well as illnesses linked to tobacco use.

Smoking-related healthcare costs in Kentucky total $1.5 billion a year, with lost productivity in the state attributable to smoking worth about $2.13 billion, according to a study by the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. The study used data from government agencies and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Because many smokers are poor, smoking-related Medicaid expenses in Kentucky cost state government $145.4 million and the federal government $341.5 million a year. The study estimates smoking’s total burden on Kentucky taxpayers at nearly $985 million a year.

Substantially higher cigarette taxes would prompt more adults to quit smoking, fewer kids to start and save taxpayers and businesses a fortune, said Ellen Hahn, a University of Kentucky nursing professor and anti-smoking crusader. “It’s the single most important thing we could do to reduce consumption,” she said.

Hahn warned, though, that a small tax increase won’t be enough to reduce consumption, because cigarette companies will simply cut their prices and profit margins to maintain sales.

In addition to all of the smoking-related deaths, pain and suffering, Hahn said, healthcare organizations estimate that Kentucky could save more than $1.3 billion in long-term healthcare costs with a 70-cent increase in the cigarette tax.

“That’s the piece that people don’t realize,” she said. “People who aren’t smokers say this doesn’t affect me. But it affects everyone. It’s money out of our pockets.”

Share/Save/Bookmark



5 Responses to “Raise cigarette tax to save taxpayers money”

  1.   JAMES MATTINGLY Says:

    I SMOKE AND DO NOT SEE A PROBLEM WITH A TAX INCREASE.
    HOWEVER IF WE ARE GOING TO TAX CIGARETTES LETS ALSO
    PUT A SPECIAL TAX INCREASE ON;
    FAST FOOD
    LIQUOR
    WHOLE MILK
    RED MEAT
    AND
    PEOPLE THATS OVER WEIGHT,
    ALL ARE HEALTH PROBLEMS
    THAT ALSO RUN UP MEDICAL COST
    AND USE UP TAX $$$$
    WHY SINGLE OUT ONE THING????
    MAYBE THE PEOPLE PUSHING IT
    DO NOT SMOKE

  2.   Nathan Says:

    Excellent point by James Mattingly, despite the ALL CAPS…

    The thing driving up our health insurance costs has to do with a lot more than just smoking, which is far less prevalent today than even 10 years ago… yet health insurance costs keep rising and rising. It is mainly the very poor American diet which is mostly to blame for this. (There are lots of other, global, reasons why these foods are bad for us as well)

    Not everybody smokes, but everyone eats. Eating food, drinking water, breathing air, sleeping, and expelling our waste are the only things we do as humans that are vital to keeping us alive. Thus, the food we eat is extremely important to our overall health. Too many people eat for pleasure rather than realizing it is a crucial activity. We base our choices too much on whims and convenience rather than nutrition.

    a tax is a heavy-handed way to deal with this issue, but if it makes sense for smoking, i have to say the same logic applies to unhealthy food as well.

  3.   MichaelJMcFadden Says:

    As usual with these tax pushers, the writer starts out with an assumption based on a lie: that smokers cost the health system more money than they pay into it. That wasn’t true ten years ago at MUCH lower tax rates and it’s not true today. Antismokers like to fuzz it up by fantasizing with numbers about “productivity” losses that they pull out of very dark places, but anyone who visits http://paan.TheTruthIsALie.com and reads “Taxes, Costs, and the MSA” will see the facts.

    At current tax rates smokers are subsidizing the health care costs of NONsmokers. If everyone quit smoking we’d see health care costs overall go up by at least twenty or thirty percent… perhaps even much more.

    Visit the link and read the article. If you find *anything* specific in it that you feel is questionable, share it with the rest of us here. I’ll be back. - - -

    Michael J. McFadden,
    Author of “Dissecting Antismokers’ Brains”

  4.   john57 Says:

    “Not everybody smokes, but everyone eats.”

    Last I heard, there weren’t any issues involving “secondhand eating” causing health issues for anyone…..

  5.   MichaelJMcFadden Says:

    I’m sorry: the link in my post above was missing a letter and leads to an error page. The proper link is:

    http://pasan.TheTruthIsALie.com

    I’d like to respond to John’s comment on secondhand eating though. Aside from the health costs of obesity, there’s the concept of “secondhand alcohol” to consider, and I don’t simply mean wife-beating and drunk driving. Just as with tobacco smoke or sunshine there has never been a “safe level” established for alcohol and alcohol is a highly volatile liquid. See this link from the British Medical Journal for a full examination of what you might at first think is simple silliness:

    http://www.bmj.com/cgi/eletters/330/7495/812#103642

    You’ll note that I *DO* think it’s simple silliness… but it’s just as real as secondary smoke is supposed to be in terms of a threat.

    Michael J. McFadden
    Author of “Dissecting Antismokers’ Brains”

Leave a Reply

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word