Lexington’s bones may return to Kentucky

March 14, 2009

Why did Central Kentucky become the center of thoroughbred breeding? One reason was Lexington — not the city, the horse.

Lexington was a big bay stallion, the best racer of his time and perhaps the best sire of all time. He was born here and spent most of his life here. But he has spent most of his death in storage at the Smithsonian Institution in Washington, D.C., and, well, Kentucky wants him back.

Lengthy negotiations are about complete to put Lexington’s reconstructed skeleton on display at the International Museum of the Horse at the Kentucky Horse Park.

“It looks pretty good right now,” said museum curator Bill Cooke, who is expecting a call any day from Smithsonian conservators who must release Lexington’s skeleton, officially known as Catalogue No. 16020.

The effort began more than two years ago when the horse museum became a Smithsonian associate, which allows it to borrow artifacts. “The first thing I said was we want to bring Lexington back to Lexington,” Cooke said.

“I’ve always wanted to have (an exhibit) that traces the history of the thoroughbred in Kentucky,” he said. “How did we get to be the thoroughbred capital instead of Nashville or New Orleans or New York? To a large extent, Lexington determined that we did.”

Borrowing horse bones — even famous horse bones — wouldn’t seem that complicated. But bureaucracy is bureaucracy.

At the time, Lexington was on rare public display as part of an exhibit at the Smithsonian’s Museum of American History. Then, that museum closed for lengthy renovations, and nobody seemed to know if Lexington would be needed when it reopened. Just a couple of months ago, officials decided he wouldn’t.

“They have been very supportive all the way along,” Cooke said of Smithsonian officials. “They believe in the project.”

The timing is good because on Tuesday — the horse Lexington’s 159th birthday — the Lexington Convention and Visitors Bureau will kick off a marketing campaign built around a famous painting of Lexington — with the great horse recolored Wildcat blue.

The horse-of-a-different-color idea is an eye-catching gimmick. But using the horse Lexington to promote the city Lexington is a natural, said Ellen Gregory, a public relations executive who helped develop the campaign.

Gregory said the more she researched the great horse the more obsessed she became with him, because he had connections to so many famous people and events.

Lexington was born in 1850 at the farm of Dr. Elisha Warfield, a prominent physician, horseman and entrepreneur who treated Mary Todd Lincoln’s mother, was a friend of Henry Clay and became known as “the father of the Kentucky turf.”

Lexington, originally named Darley, won six of his seven starts, becoming the third-leading money-winner up to that time. He was retired to stud in 1855 because he was going blind and stood for 20 years at Nantura and Woodburn farms near Midway.

As a stud, Lexington was taken out of Kentucky only twice — to St. Louis for an exhibition in 1859 and to Illinois for safe-keeping in 1865, when Confederates were raiding Kentucky horse farms.

Lexington was the nation’s leading sire for a record 16 years, and many of his offspring became top sires. The blind horse fathered 600 foals, more than 200 of whom became winners. His descendants included Aristides, the first winner of the Kentucky Derby.

Another famous Lexington offspring was Cincinnati, Gen. Ulysses S. Grant’s favorite horse. Grant rode Cincinnati to accept Robert E. Lee’s surrender at Appomattox and let President Abraham Lincoln ride him several times.

Lexington was such a celebrity that people came to Woodburn Farm from all over the world just to see him. One was Gen. George Armstrong Custer, who later wrote that visiting the horse was like being “in the sacred presence of royalty.”

When Lexington died, the New York Times published a lengthy obituary. “He was probably more famous in his day than even Man O’ War and Secretariat were in their days,” Cooke said.

Smithsonian representatives came to Woodburn Farm on July 1, 1875, not knowing Lexington had died earlier in the day. A few months later, they arranged for his remains to be exhumed and shipped to Washington, where they have been ever since.

Once he gets the word, Cooke said he will raise the private money needed to move Lexington’s skeleton and build a special glass case for it. The Smithsonian generally makes such loans on a five-year renewing basis.

“Hopefully this is going to be a long-term deal,” Cooke said of Lexington’s homecoming. “As long as we’ve worked on it, it’s already a long-term deal.”

Share/Save/Bookmark


Kentucky honors native son it once despised

February 12, 2009

FRANKFORT — Sandwiched between rallies by advocates for children and dogs, state political leaders gathered in the Capitol rotunda Thursday for a ceremony marking the 200th birthday of Abraham Lincoln.

Gospel artist Kenny Bishop and a Kentucky State University choir sang. Actor Greg Hardison read excerpts from Lincoln’s second inaugural address. Kentucky’s poet laureate, Jane Gentry Vance, read a poem she wrote about Lincoln. Kent Whitworth of the Kentucky Historical Society remarked that 100,000 fourth- and fifth-graders across the state Thursday were studying Kentucky’s greatest gift to the nation.

Gov. Steve Beshear, House Speaker Greg Stumbo and Senate President David Williams paused from dealing with Kentucky’s economic crisis long enough to place a floral wreath at the foot of the giant bronze statue of Lincoln in the center of the rotunda. Then, like thousands of tourists before them, they rubbed Lincoln’s shiny left toe for good luck.

As I stood in the crowded rotunda, I wondered what Lincoln would have thought about all the fuss Kentuckians were making over him. He would have felt honored and humbled, I’m sure. And given what we know about his sense of humor, he probably would have had a good laugh.

Lincoln always loved his home state, but as historian John Kleber reminded the gathering, it wasn’t until after his assassination that many Kentuckians returned the love. “In no ‘Northern’ state was he so vilified and hated,” Kleber said.

Lincoln was a second-generation Kentuckian. Both of his parents were Kentuckians, as were his beloved stepmother, his wife, his best friend and all three of his law partners. He grew up in Indiana surrounded by Kentuckians. His political idol was Henry Clay of Lexington.

Yet, in the election of 1860, a four-man race that Lincoln won with 40 percent of the national vote, he received only 1,364 votes in Kentucky — less than 1 percent. In Fayette County, where his wife’s family lived, he got only five votes. Four years later, he did little better, losing Kentucky to Gen. George McClellan, 61,478 votes to 26,592.

Think you have in-law problems? Mary Todd Lincoln’s family owned slaves and leaned Southern. Three of Lincoln’s brothers-in-law died fighting for the Confederacy. His Southern-sympathizing sisters-in-law were a constant source of political embarrassment.

Although Kentucky never seceded from the Union, most of the state’s powerful people were wedded to slavery and rabidly racist. Lincoln angered many Kentuckians by issuing the Emancipation Proclamation and allowing free blacks to join the Union Army.

Americans have a habit of turning their martyred leaders into saints, and they set the standard with Lincoln. From his face on the penny to the huge marble monument in Washington, Lincoln has been a vessel that generations of Americans have filled with their ideas of perfection.

Perhaps the most interesting aspect of the two-year national celebration of Lincoln’s bicentennial has been the peeling away of myth to reveal a more complex, more flawed and more human character who is even more worthy of admiration.

For example, Lincoln has long been revered by African-Americans as the Great Emancipator. Yet, we’re reminded that while he always considered slavery to be morally wrong, he thought runaway slaves should be returned to their masters, would have preferred gradual emancipation and once thought former slaves should be shipped back to Africa or to colonies in Panama.

Most white Kentuckians of the time considered Lincoln to be a dangerously radical liberal. It wasn’t because he believe in equality of the races, but because he believed that black people were fully human.

It’s always dangerous to judge historic figures — especially politicians — by modern standards. Politics has always been about compromise. Had Lincoln been more “enlightened,” he never would have been elected president. Does it matter that he ended slavery as a political tactic for preserving the union, rather than as a moral imperative? The result was the same.

Two centuries after Lincoln’s birth, there remains much we can learn from this most remarkable Kentuckian. He educated himself, listened to his conscience, learned from his mistakes, didn’t take himself too seriously, let his thinking evolve with the times and met his enormous challenges without flinching.

He also reminded us in simple but profound language what our country stands for — or should stand for.

Share/Save/Bookmark


Lincoln honored in state capitol ceremony

February 12, 2009

FRANKFORT — Gov. Steve Beshear, Senate President David Williams and House Speaker Greg Stumbo paused a few moments from trying to solve today’s problems to mark Abraham Lincoln’s 200th birthday Thursday by laying a wreath at the feet of his bronze statue in the center of the state capitol rotunda.

Then, like thousands of tourists before them, they rubbed Lincoln’s shiny left toe for good luck.

The early-afternoon ceremony was delayed so Beshear could get back to Frankfort from Hodgenville, where he participated in festivities in Lincoln’s hometown.

The capitol ceremony included musical performances by gospel singer Kenny Bishop and the Kentucky State University Concert Choir Ensemble. Actor Greg Hardison recited some of Lincoln’s famous second inaugural address, and Kentucky Poet Laureate Jane Gentry Vance read her poem about Lincoln, based on the famous 1863 portrait of the Civil War president by Alexander Gardner.

Kent Whitworth, executive director of the Kentucky Historical Society, noted that 100,000 Kentucky fourth- and fifth-graders were spending the day in a joint study of Kentucky’s most famous native son.  Historian John Kleber of the University of Louisville reminded the gathering that Lincoln always loved his native state, although most of its residents during his lifetime had little regard for him.

“In no ‘northern’ state was he so vilified and hated,” Kleber said, adding, “He belonged to us, the people of Kentucky, because no claim shall come before the mother.”

I’ll have more to say about the Lincoln-Kentucky paradox here later today, and in Friday’s Herald-Leader.

Share/Save/Bookmark


Jefferson Davis’ life still holds lessons

May 31, 2008

He was born in a log cabin in Kentucky, grew up to be president and led his nation through a bitter Civil War.

No, not Abraham Lincoln.

The other guy: Jefferson Davis.

The 200th birthday of the only president of the Confederate States of America is Tuesday, and it will pass with little notice.

A few modest ceremonies and a historians’ symposium are planned this month, and there will be a festival next weekend at Davis’ hometown of Fairview in Todd County. That’s where a 351-foot concrete obelisk was built to his memory in the early 1900s by old men of the Lost Cause.

The commemorations are in stark contrast to the two-year national celebration that began in February to mark the bicentennial of Lincoln, who was born eight months later and 125 miles away, near Hodgenville in LaRue County.

Lincoln achieved mythic status after he died a martyr as the Civil War was ending. In the pantheon of American heroes, he’s right up there with George Washington.

Davis, on the other hand, is a man few now want to acknowledge, much less celebrate.

Before the Civil War, few would have predicted their fates.

Lincoln was homely and awkward. He educated himself while working as a frontier store clerk. His military career was modest. He married well by Lexington standards, but the Todds had little influence outside the Bluegrass.

After holding small political jobs, practicing law and serving in the Illinois legislature, Lincoln was elected to a single two-year term in Congress. He won the presidency in 1860 with not quite 40 percent of the vote in a four-way race that included John C. Breckinridge of Lexington. Lincoln was openly mocked, even by some in his own government. His emancipation of slaves was not a popular move.

Davis, on the other hand, was the handsome ideal of Southern manhood. He left Kentucky at an early age, as Lincoln did, but returned as the only Protestant pupil at a good Catholic school in Springfield. He studied at Transylvania, then one of the nation’s best colleges, before leaving Lexington to attend West Point.

He served twice in the military with distinction and married the daughter of his commander, the future President Zachary Taylor. She died of malaria three months after the wedding. He married well a second time, too, securing a comfortable place in Mississippi’s plantation aristocracy. He represented Mississippi in the U.S. House, served as secretary of war and was elected to the U.S. Senate.

Davis opposed secession, but when Mississippi left the union, he resigned his Senate seat and a month later was elected president of the Confederacy.

“In some ways, the elevation of Lincoln over Davis isn’t quite fair,” said Brian Dirck, a history professor at Anderson University in Indiana and author of Lincoln and Davis: Imagining America, 1809-1865.

“Jefferson Davis was a talented man; before 1860, most people would have said he was more talented than Abraham Lincoln,” he said. “There are many people who felt (Davis) would have made a good president of the United States before the war.”

Davis did a remarkable job of holding together a confederacy founded on the principle that states’ rights supersede those of a central government. Throughout the war, he was constantly sparring with state courts and legislatures.

“I doubt anyone else could have done a better job, given the circumstances,” Dirck said.

“But here’s the thing: He lost. And by that I mean not only did he lose the war, he lost the battle for the Confederacy’s legacy, as well. After the war, he told anybody who would listen that the Confederacy was not about defending slavery, but rather the Constitution and states’ rights. He wrote a book to that effect - a really long, tedious book, I might add - and for a while people believed him.”

The Confederacy, of course, was all about slavery; the South’s wealth depended on it. Jefferson Davis led the fight for slavery and ended up as the poster boy for the most evil social institution in American history.

Davis’ view that slavery “was established by decree of Almighty God … it is sanctioned in the Bible” was conventional wisdom in the South of his day, where slavery had existed for 250 years. People used Scripture then to defend slavery the way others would use it later to deny equal rights to women and gay people.

The United States is great because it is a nation of values, and high on that list of values is equal rights. We really believe that stuff about all people being created equal and entitled to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Of course, our entire history has involved struggles to make those words reality. In many ways, we’re still working on it.

I’ve always been fascinated by historic figures such as Jefferson Davis, the man who stood for all of the popular things and is now pitied for it.

And it makes me wonder: When people look back on us a generation or a century or two from now, who will be our Jefferson Davises? Whom will people revere, and whom will they pity?

Share/Save/Bookmark